XAML is silly
Someone came into work today with a t-shirt saying: <canvas> ideas go here </canvas> I said it was HTML5, he said it was XAML, especially since it is a Microsoft shirt. Now, he is technically correct, but I hate the term anyway. This may not be entirely correct, but this is how I see the situation: Here's the thing, XAML means "Extensible Application Markup Language" - it's XML with an A inserted. What is it, though? How does it differ from XML? From what I can tell, it doesn't. XAML is just XML interpreted by a program in a particular way, it is a subset of XML. As a language, it doesn't differ or add anything to XML. The difference is in how the XML is interpreted by an external program. As such, XAML doesn't deserve to be called a different language. It's not like HTML - since HTML4, HTML has incorporated XML, becoming XHTML. But XHTML is visibly different to XML (as a major difference, HTML has attributes within the tag definition it...