XAML is silly

Someone came into work today with a t-shirt saying:
<canvas>
ideas go here
</canvas>

I said it was HTML5, he said it was XAML, especially since it is a Microsoft shirt.
Now, he is technically correct, but I hate the term anyway. This may not be entirely correct, but this is how I see the situation:

Here's the thing, XAML means "Extensible Application Markup Language" - it's XML with an A inserted. What is it, though? How does it differ from XML?

From what I can tell, it doesn't.
XAML is just XML interpreted by a program in a particular way, it is a subset of XML. As a language, it doesn't differ or add anything to XML. The difference is in how the XML is interpreted by an external program.
As such, XAML doesn't deserve to be called a different language.

It's not like HTML - since HTML4, HTML has incorporated XML, becoming XHTML. But XHTML is visibly different to XML (as a major difference, HTML has attributes within the tag definition itself, but XML's "attributes" are sub-tags)

Just to re-iterate, I'm going to double check all of this, but as of right now, this is how it seems to me. XAML is not a language, it is an extension of Extensible Markup Language (XML), with no differences that can justify calling it a separate language.

Comments

Jon Dowland said…
XML describes pure syntax. An "implementation" of XML (such as xaml, or XHTML) extend it with something else: not quite semantics, but rules like "body must go in HTML". And probably semantics as well. They harness the power of "outsourcing" syntax to XML, which allows for tool reuse.

The w3c have disbanded the XHTML working group and 1.1 remains unfinished. The future of the web is HTML again: not the XML-dialect XHTML, but a derivation of HTML4.

Who is driving it and what it's called are a complex story: read up on whatwg.
26 May 2011 at 17:59
Jon Dowland said…
I forgot to say: XML has attributes too, but implementations are not consistent as to when they use attributes and when they use child elements.
26 May 2011 at 18:01
Jon Rimmer said…
It's a common convention for technologies that use XML syntax to have a name like something something Language. Some examples are XUL, which is Mozilla's UI markup language, or MathML. There's a more complete list on Wikipedia.
26 May 2011 at 20:44
Anonymous said…
XAML is just an XML schema. XHTML is another one.

It's one specific use of XML. Basically they're different layers.
30 May 2011 at 13:54
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Godot - Rotating a Camera in 3d space

Image
For the past couple of years I've been dabbling about in Unity, but due to their recent PR disaster, I've shifted over into dabbling with Godot instead. The project I'm trying to create is a turn-based strategy game, which would include terrain. As such, units might be hidden behind terrain, so the user should be able to rotate the camera. To this end I've been following the Godot tutorials, creating a 3d plane, and putting a box in one corner so that I can see how the whole thing would rotate (if it were a plain plane, I wouldn't be able to tell it rotated). I didn't bother putting in a player character yet (as the concept is quite different to the example in the tutorial), but I did follow the steps  for implementing a camera. I wanted the camera to rotate by increments of 90 degrees (so there would effectively be 4 positions). Unfortunately, most of the maths in the documentation is about radians, which doesn't seem useful to me for this case, as it makes...
Read more

Commander Sterling

Image
I've been keeping this one under my hat, a wee bit. It's fair to say that I'm a fan of James Stephanie Sterling's work - I remember when they started publishing videos on the Escapist, and at first they weren't for me, though eventually I went back and got hooked. Seeing their transformation, and hearing their explanation about it, has definitely helped me overcome a great degree of ignorance when it comes to LBGTQIA+ issues. Since they started wrestling not just in England, but local to me, I wanted to make a doll of them to give as a present, which I managed to at the debut of Avant Garde wrestling: On a separate note, it was my first live show - I may do a bit of a write up, though I'm not familiar enough with the art to go much further than "I enjoyed it!" The doll itself is, like the other dolls I've made and intend to make, based upon the patterns in  AmiguruME by Allison Hoffman . The main differences to m...
Read more

Janos Audron Amigurumi

Image
This one has been in the works for a very long time, but last weekend I finally finished the amigurumi of Janos Audron that I've been working on for (no exaggeration here) - around 2 1/2 years! Let's get into the details. First of all, it cannot be understated how big this thing is: 1 foot tall and with a 2 foot wingspan tip to tip! This was, like the Sunny doll, based on the patterns in  AmiguruME by Allison Hoffman , though there were a few adaptations. The most obvious one is the wings. When I started these off I was using a Magpie pattern from Hanneke's Designs . However, the free CAL (Crochet A-Long) period ran out while I was working on it, and I didn't have a backup. Rather than buying it, I reflected and felt that the pattern just wasn't quite right. Eventually I managed to find this Pegasus by Crafty Designs , which I felt would result in something large enough with enough detail to satisfy me. I really am too much of a perfectionist, but not so much that w...
Read more